Examples of enterprises/tools that “push” knowledge or information outward:
- Libraries
- Traditional media: TV, radio, magazines, newspapers
- Portals
- Knowledge centers
- Most Internet websites
- Databanks, knowledge repositories, knowledge banks
- Advertisements
- Blog posts and story telling
Examples of enterprises/tools that “pull” knowledge or information inward:
- Enterprises that offer research assistance services
- Customized news alerts
- Help desks
- Search engines, especially those that are customized or federated over a specialized set of URLs or a particular type of networks/communities of interest.
- RSS and Atom feeds
Examples of enterprises/tools that enable matching/connection between users and suppliers of knowledge/information:
- e-Commerce networks, clearinghouses
- Enterprises that enable trading, e.g. eBay
- Professional networks with query-answer functionalities e.g. Solutions Exchange, LinkedIn
- Directories
- Knowledge repositories set up and used by specialized interest or academic groups
- Taxonomies and CMS functionalities such as tags, keywords and categories
Note that solely “knowledge push” approaches are knowledge owner/supplier driven and tend to be expensive (see previous post on “D7- Supply-driven KM versus Demand-driven KM”). “Knowledge pull” approaches are user-driven and generally more cost-effective because the effort expended by the knowledge supplier is only that which is needed to fulfill each user’s specific needs.
=>Back to main page of Apin Talisayon’s Weblog
=>Jump to Clickable Master Index
Tags: demand-driven KM, knowledge management, knowledge pull, knowledge push, supply-driven KM
November 27, 2009 at 11:57 am
Most of the time I do not post on blogs, but I have to say that this post really forced me to do so!