D7- Supply-driven KM versus Demand-driven KM

Signs that a KM program, project or initiative is supply driven:

  • The link between KM and organizational goals is unstated, unclear or taken for granted.
  • The KM initiative starts with a solution or tool, e.g. intranet or community of practice.
  • The question “what do we know?” drives the KM initiative.
  • The KM initiative revolves around describing knowledge supply and uses KM tools such as knowledge inventory, knowledge mapping, tracing knowledge flows, data banking or data warehousing, storytelling, blogs and/or social network analysis; asking knowledge users what they need or asking feedback from internal/external customers is absent
  • The KM initiative is basically top-down or external consultant driven or technology oriented, with little participation or input from its users and beneficiaries
  • The KM framework is the knowledge cycle, or some kind of KM maturity model or a model disconnected from organizational value creation or performance.
  • The purpose adopted is “to share knowledge” or “to codify knowledge” but the questions “what for?” and “why?” are left unanswered.
  • The KM metrics, if any, are not related or remotely related to organizational goals.

If your KM initiative is supply-driven, then its contribution to organizational goals is unclear and it is likely to be not cost-effective or worse, it is wasting resources.

Signs that a KM program, project or initiative is demand-driven:

  • The alignment between KM goals and organizational goals is clearly stated; how KM will contribute to organizational value creation is explicit.
  • The KM initiative starts with a problem or need; it addresses an organization’s “highest pain.”
  • The question “what do we need to know” drives the KM initiative.
  • KM starts with knowledge needs/gaps analysis, survey of knowledge needs of users/stakeholders or feedback of internal and/or external customers.
  • The KM intervention is designed around the value proposition of the organization; it seeks to contribute to the enhancement of the organization’s core business process or “highest gain”
  • The purpose adopted is to improve performance, to produce some desired results or to enhance value creation.
  • The KM metrics, if any, are directly linked to organizational goals.

Read about an example of lean and mean KM in: “High-Octane KM” is Demand-Driven KM. Read also about the difference between “knowledge-push” and “knowledge-pull” approaches.

=>Back to main page of Apin Talisayon’s Weblog
=>Jump to Clickable Master Index

Tags: , , , ,

One Response to “D7- Supply-driven KM versus Demand-driven KM”

  1. Library clips :: Preparing for community release :: April :: 2009 Says:

    […] think the deployment of our CoPs is a mix of a KM demand and supply strategy. At a macro level it’s about sharing knowledge in general, getting around hierarchies by […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: